The silence isn't a reflection of your ability. Most qualified candidates get skipped — not rejected — because their CV creates a moment of hesitation the recruiter doesn't have time to sit with.
You've put in the effort. You've applied. You've waited. There's a reason the calls aren't coming — and it's almost certainly fixable.
Recruiters work under time pressure and high volume. When a CV requires interpretation — even slightly — it gets deprioritised. Not rejected. The Too Hard Basket isn't about quality. It's about clarity. That's what this measures.
You're qualified. You've tailored your applications. You've done everything you were told to do. And still — silence. Or worse, a politely worded rejection that tells you nothing useful.
Here's what most career advice won't tell you: the problem often isn't what's on your CV. It's how your CV reads in the first 10–15 seconds — under real time pressure, high volume, and a recruiter who needs to make a defensible decision fast.
Every CV is evaluated — consciously or not — across five decision filters. A gap in any one of them is enough to create hesitation. And hesitation, under time pressure, almost always leads to a skip.
Can a recruiter place you in 10 seconds? If not, the rest may never be read.
Does your language, level and sector match the brief without effort?
Every second spent interpreting you increases the risk of a skip.
Why you, over the other 40? That answer must be visible — not implied.
Can a recruiter justify shortlisting you? If it takes effort, they won't.
Rewriting bullet points. Adding keywords. Adjusting formatting. All useful — but none of it addresses the actual decision happening on the other side of the screen.
A recruiter isn't evaluating your document. They're managing risk — deciding who they can confidently present to a hiring manager, under accountability and time pressure. If your profile creates even a small moment of uncertainty, it gets quietly set aside.
This audit is built around that decision — not career theory. It exists to show you where that hesitation is most likely happening, before it costs you another opportunity you were right for.
Most services improve the CV.
This identifies why recruiters hesitate.
The Recruiter Decision Model™
What are they? Can I place them in 10–15 seconds? If not, the rest may not get read at all.
How much effort does this take to understand? Ambiguity creates friction. Friction creates risk.
Does this match the brief? Language, level and sector need to signal immediately — not after reading.
Why this person over the other 40? Their edge must be visible, not inferred.
Can I justify presenting this candidate? If that answer requires effort to construct, they get deprioritised.
The Recruiter Friction Score™ measures how your CV performs across all five of these filters — and tells you exactly where the hesitation is happening. Two minutes. Free. And it gives you something most candidates never get: a real answer.
There's no CV upload. No preparation. No hoops to jump through. Just 11 honest questions, answered as accurately as you can, that map directly onto how recruiters actually make decisions.
The result isn't a generic score with generic tips. It's a specific reading of where your CV is likely losing momentum — and whether the fix is small or structural.
What you get for free
Built from the recruiter's side
This isn't built by career coaches who read CVs. It's built around how recruiters actually make decisions — under time pressure, shortlist targets, and accountability to hiring managers who will question every name on the list.
I went from one interview in six weeks to three interviews in two weeks after fixing the exact hesitation points the audit identified. It wasn't a wording issue. It was a positioning issue I couldn't see myself.
I had the experience, but my CV was making recruiters work too hard. Once I fixed the structure and role framing, responses started coming — including from roles I had already been ignored for.
This completely changed how I think about job searching. I stopped trying to sound impressive and started making myself easy to categorise and defend. That reframe changed everything.
The diagnostic was far more precise than any CV feedback I had paid for before. A small number of targeted changes led to a clear lift in recruiter response rate within the next round of applications.
The free audit is designed to tell you whether deeper work is even warranted. Most people should start there — because many won't need anything more.
A fast screening diagnostic that shows whether your CV is being skipped because of ambiguity, friction, or poor positioning.
For candidates whose score suggests the problem is structural, not cosmetic. Only relevant if your result points to real screening friction.
For senior candidates, career pivots, or people who need help across CV, role targeting and interview positioning.
The audit exists to stop you buying help you don't actually need.
About 2 minutes. There are 11 questions, no CV upload, and no preparation required. The point is speed — to give you an honest signal about whether your CV is likely helping or quietly hurting you.
You'll receive your Recruiter Friction Score, a banded interpretation of what that number likely means for your applications, and a clear indication of whether you need no action, minor adjustments, or a deeper structural diagnostic. All of it is emailed to you so you can come back to it.
It reflects how easily a recruiter can understand, categorise, and confidently move your profile forward under real screening conditions. It is not a measure of your ability, your experience quality, or your career value. It measures how clearly those things are being communicated — and that distinction matters enormously.
Yes — and this is more common than most people expect. Capability and clarity are two different things. Strong candidates frequently undersell themselves in ways they cannot see from the inside. The score measures how your experience is communicating, not the quality of the experience itself. That's the gap this is designed to close.
No. This measures how your profile is being interpreted during screening — before anyone decides whether to invite you to interview. A rewrite changes the wording. A diagnostic identifies why recruiters hesitate in the first place. These are fundamentally different problems, and solving one does not solve the other.
You'll see whether your issue is likely cosmetic, positional, or structural. From there, you can decide whether to address it yourself using the direction provided, or enquire about a full diagnostic if the score suggests a deeper problem. There's no pressure either way — the result is designed to give you clarity, not create urgency that isn't warranted.
Yes. It shows you how the market currently interprets your experience. Structural clarity affects future opportunities and internal mobility — not just active job searches. Understanding where friction exists now means you can address it before it costs you an opportunity you care about.
AI can improve wording. It cannot reliably tell you where a recruiter loses confidence in your profile, why your positioning creates ambiguity, or how your experience is being categorised under time pressure. Those are screening problems — not writing problems. The tools are different because the diagnosis is different.
Because most people should not pay for help until they know whether there is actually a problem — and how serious it is. The free audit is the filter. It tells you whether deeper work is warranted, what kind, and roughly how much of a difference it's likely to make. We'd rather you start there than spend money on something you may not need.
In two minutes, you can see whether your profile is helping you, quietly working against you, or costing you interviews you should already be getting. That's worth knowing.
Enter your email to see your score on screen and get a full copy sent to your inbox so you can revisit it. The result loads immediately.
Results only. No generic newsletter.